If we play around with compound statements and explore what can and cannot happen, we will quickly run into some statements which seem (potentially) rather silly:
\begin{gather*}
P \lor (\neg P)
\end{gather*}
This statement is always true — no matter whether \(P\) is true or false. Such a statement is called a tautology. Why might this be useful? Well — you’ve seen that when we prove things, we need to use things that are true and the above is always true.
This statement is always true no matter what the truth values of \(P\) and \(Q\text{,}\) so it is a tautology. To see this we could either write up the truth-table, or argue
The left-hand clause is false only when \(P\) and \(Q\) are both true. Otherwise it is false.
The right-hand clause is false only when \(\neg P\) and \(\neg Q\) are both false. That is, it is only true when both \(P\) and \(Q\) are false. Otherwise it is true.
We will use tautologies in the very near future, but contradictions will have to wait until later in the course — there is a proof technique called “proof by contradiction” which relies on us arriving at a contradiction.