We prove the result by reformulating it as a divergence theorem statement. To that end, we define
\begin{align*}
V&=\Set{(x,y,z)}{ (x,y)\in R,\ \ 0\le z\le 1}\\
\vG(x,y,z) &= F_2(x,y)\,\hi -F_1(x,y)\,\hj
\end{align*}
Notice that \(V\) is exactly the volume obtained by expanding \(R\) vertically upward by one unit.
The definition of \(\vG\) does not contain a typo — the \(x\)-component of \(\vG\) really is \(F_2\) and the \(y\)-component of \(\vG\) really is \(-F_1\text{.}\) (More or less the reverse of what you would normally write down.)
These definitions have been rigged so that the divergence theorem applied to \(\vG\) and \(V\text{,}\) namely
\begin{align*}
\dblInt_{\partial V} \vG\cdot\hn\,\dee{S}
&=\tripInt_V\vnabla\cdot\vG\ \dee{V}
\end{align*}
gives us exactly Green’s theorem, as we shall now see.
Since \(\vnabla\cdot\vG = \frac{\partial F_2}{\partial x}
- \frac{\partial F_1}{\partial y}\text{,}\) the right hand side is just
\begin{align*}
\tripInt_V\vnabla\cdot\vG\ \dee{V}
&= \dblInt_{R}\dee{x}\dee{y}\int_0^1\dee{z} \ \vnabla\cdot\vG\\
&= \dblInt_{R}\dee{x}\dee{y}\int_0^1\dee{z} \
\left(\frac{\partial F_2}{\partial x}(x,y)
- \frac{\partial F_1}{\partial y}(x,y)\right)\\
&= \dblInt_{R}\dee{x}\dee{y}\
\left(\frac{\partial F_2}{\partial x}(x,y)
- \frac{\partial F_1}{\partial y}(x,y)\right)
\end{align*}
because the integrand is independent of \(z\text{.}\) This is exactly the right hand side of Green’s theorem.
Now for the left hand side. The boundary, \(\partial V\text{,}\) of \(V\) is the union of the (flat) bottom, the (flat) top and the (curved) side. The outward unit normal on the (horizontal, flat) top is \(+\hk\) and the outward unit normal on the (horizontal, flat) bottom is \(-\hk\) so that
\begin{align*}
\dblInt_{\partial V} \vG\cdot\hn\,\dee{S}
&=\dblInt_{\text{top}} \vG\cdot\hk\,\dee{S}
+\dblInt_{\text{bottom}} \vG\cdot(-\hk)\,\dee{S}
+\dblInt_{\text{side}} \vG\cdot\hn\,\dee{S}\\
&=\dblInt_{\text{side}} \vG\cdot\hn\,\dee{S}
\end{align*}
We have used the fact that the \(\hk\) component of \(\vG\) is exactly zero to discard the integrals over the top and bottom of \(\partial V\text{.}\) To evaluate the integral over the side, we’ll parametrize the side. Suppose that \(\vr(t)=x(t)\,\hi +y(t)\,\hj\text{,}\) \(a\le t\le b\text{,}\) is a parametrization of \(C\text{,}\) with the arrow in the figure above giving the direction of increasing \(t\text{.}\) Then we can use
\begin{gather*}
\vR(t,z) = \vr(t) +z\,\hk
= x(t)\,\hi +y(t)\,\hj +z\,\hk \qquad a\le t\le b,\ 0\le z\le 1
\end{gather*}
as a parametrization of the side. We’ll use (
3.3.1) to determine
\(\hn\,\dee{S}\) for the side. Since
\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial\vR}{\partial t}(t,z) & = x'(t)\,\hi +y'(t)\,\hj\\
\frac{\partial\vR}{\partial z}(t,z) & = \hk
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
\hn\,\dee{S} &= \frac{\partial\vR}{\partial t}(t,z)\times
\frac{\partial\vR}{\partial z}(t,z)\ \dee{t}\dee{z}\\
&= \big(x'(t)\,\hi +y'(t)\,\hj\big)\times \hk\ \dee{t}\dee{z}\\
&= \big(-x'(t)\,\hj +y'(t)\,\hi\big)\ \dee{t}\dee{z}
\end{align*}
Note that with this choice of \(\pm\) sign (that is, \(\frac{\partial\vR}{\partial t}\times
\frac{\partial\vR}{\partial z}\ \dee{t}\dee{z}\) rather than \(-\frac{\partial\vR}{\partial t}\times
\frac{\partial\vR}{\partial z}\ \dee{t}\dee{z}\)), the vector \(\hn\) really is the outward pointing normal, as we see from the sketch
We can now compute the surface integral directly.
\begin{align*}
&\dblInt_{\partial V} \vG\cdot\hn\,\dee{S}
=\dblInt_{\text{side}} \vG\cdot\hn\,\dee{S}\\
&\hskip0.25in=\int_a^b\dee{t}\int_0^1\dee{z}\ \vG\big(\vR(t,z)\big)\cdot
\big(-x'(t)\,\hj +y'(t)\,\hi\big)\\
&\hskip0.25in=\int_a^b\dee{t}\int_0^1\dee{z}\
\big(F_2(x(t),y(t))\,\hi -F_1(x(t),y(t))\,\hj\big)\cdot
\big(-x'(t)\,\hj +y'(t)\,\hi\big)\\
&\hskip0.25in=\int_a^b\dee{t}\
\big[F_2(x(t),y(t))\,y'(t) +F_1(x(t),y(t))\,x'(t)\big]\\
&\hskip2in \text{since the integrand is independent of } z\\
&\hskip0.25in=\oint_{C} \big[F_1(x,y)\,\dee{x} +F_2(x,y)\,\dee{y}\big]
\end{align*}
This is exactly the left hand side of Green’s theorem.